London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE

Partner Elliott Phillips and Associate Paul Grant discuss the Valereum takeover of GSX

15 February 2022

Introduction

Blockchain company Valereum is on the verge – subject to regulatory approval – of purchasing a 90% stake in the Gibraltar Stock Exchange (GSX). The move proposes to create the world’s first integrated bourse where conventional bonds can be traded alongside cryptoassets and currencies. This development brings into sharp focus Gibraltar’s blossoming reputation as a pioneering jurisdiction in the Distributed Ledger Technology (DLT) space.

The Valereum Bid for GSX

Valereum’s stated aim is to provide technology for linking mainstream conventional currencies with crypto assets. The takeover is currently subject to approval by the Gibraltar Financial Services Commission (GFSC). The company has also signed a purchase agreement with the Juno Group, a Gibraltar-based trust management company, for the provision of custody services for the cryptocurrency assets acquired in the exchange. This too requires ratification by GFSC. 

Is Gibraltar ready?

Whilst other countries have adopted a cautious approach to crypto assets, either by banning or warning against investing in them, Gibraltar has encouraged a buoyant environment for licenced blockchain firms predicated upon regulatory certainty and transparency, for the protection of consumers and the weeding out of bad actors. The figures don’t lie - just fourteen firms have thus far been approved for its licensing scheme.

At regulatory level, GFSC has developed its experience in bringing the activity of crypto businesses and funds within the scope of prudential supervision and not simply subject to registration requirements. Following the creation of a working group in 2014 comprising finance centre experts, a consultation paper was commissioned by the Gibraltar Government in 2017 which laid foundations for the regulatory framework which came into effect on 1 January 2018. The Rock has done the hard yards, so to speak.

Valereum’s proposed overhaul of GSX speaks to Gibraltar’s evolution into a thriving and respectable player in the global crypto space. Minister for digital and financial services, Albert Isola, has heralded the efforts made to shed archaic views of the Rock as a tax haven. As proof, it has overhauled policies on tax and information sharing (through the signing of numerous Tax Information Exchange Agreements). The focus upon regulation follows the same vein of regulatory openness.

Gibraltar’s record of compliance with the Financial Action Task Force (FATF) anti-money laundering (AML) requirements has also been praised. The FATF’s assessment in 2019 reflected the Rock as having no record of terrorist financing whether through e-money or otherwise. It has mostly implemented FATF’s recommendations with respect to Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers. Gibraltar’s focus is on preventing, rather than enabling criminal behaviour.

What are the risks?

The view beyond Gibraltar is less certain. Some have highlighted the risk of sanction and/or reputational damage should Gibraltar fall prey to money launderers using approved crypto firms as vehicles for criminality. This continues to be a concern for global financial regulators. Malta, for example, provides a cautionary tale of a jurisdiction grey-listed by FATF for lacking financial crime safeguards; the consequences of which may yet be felt by the Maltese economy more widely.

Others view Gibraltar’s regulatory regime as so rigorous as to prohibit entry to the marketplace and deter potential investors. The cavalier view is that a jurisdiction of Gibraltar’s size might – as an agile and robust economy – prefer a riskier approach to DLT.

But that is not the image Gibraltar wishes to project. Even at the height of the initial coin offering boom in 2018, Gibraltar brought companies offering tokens within the ambit of its Proceeds of Crime and AML regime and the sensibleness of this decision was hailed at the time by many technologists and economists. Tempting as it may have been to ride the wave, the Rock opted instead to persist with its belt and braces approach. The onus remains on facilitating fewer, but higher calibre crypto firms.

What next?

The view of many on the ground is that the Valereum takeover of GSX represents another possible milestone for Gibraltar as a gateway to global business in the burgeoning crypto marketplace and further endorsement of its ‘right tough, not light touch’ regulatory environment. Minister Isola has some cautionary words for the naysayers: “If you wanted to do naughty things in crypto, you wouldn’t be in Gibraltar, because the firms are licensed and regulated, and they aren’t anywhere else in the world”.