London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE

ESG Trends and Developments in France – Chambers Global Practice Guide

19 November 2025

Excerpt:

ESG in 2025: A Practical Perspective on EU Streamlining and French Ambition

For companies operating in France and across the EU, 2025 has been the year in which ESG obligations both eased and intensified. At EU level, institutions launched a simplification drive that delays certain reporting and due diligence deadlines and proposes a narrower scope for future ESG reporting. In parallel, France has consolidated and expanded national measures, especially on marketing claims, product sustainability information, and restriction of chemicals.

The straightforward takeaway for businesses is twofold. First, the EU has formally paused parts of the timetable, creating planning room without dismantling the underlying framework. Second, France remains a comparatively demanding jurisdiction in which national rules, enforcement, and litigation risks are acute and often move ahead of, or sit alongside, EU-wide harmonisation.