Administrative and Public LawBanking and Financial Markets LitigationCivil Fraud, Asset Tracing and RecoveryCommercial LitigationCompetition LawConstruction and Engineering DisputesContentious Trusts, Estates and Private Wealth DisputesGroup Action LitigationInsolvency LitigationInsurance and Reinsurance LitigationInternational ArbitrationInvestigations and White Collar CrimeProduct LiabilityProfessional Negligence LitigationToxic Tort and ESG
Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.
FIND OUT MORE
Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.
FIND OUT MORE
Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.
FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.
FIND OUT MOREPartner Simon Fawell comments on the recent ruling refusing to extend the duty bankers owe clients to protect them against fraud in Nigeria's USD 1.7 billion case against JPMorgan in Law360. Simon's comments were published in an article in Law360, published 16 June 2022, and can be found here.
A High Court judge has rejected claims that JPMorgan breached its duty of care when it sanctioned USD 875 million of payments to a company controlled by a former Nigerian oil minister accused of corruption on instructions received from government officials.
The ruling makes clear that the "whiff of corruption" is not enough to trigger the so-called Quincecare duty owed by bankers to refuse to comply with payment instructions if there is a chance the customer is being defrauded, according to Simon Fawell, a partner at Signature Litigation.
"You have to look specifically at the transaction in front of the bank at the time," Fawell said. "It is not enough to say there is an air of corruption about a particular client or situation generally, but there needs to be a red flag in respect of the specific payment that the bank is being instructed to make."
"You have to look specifically at the transaction in front of the bank at the time," Fawell said. "It is all very well saying there is an air of corruption about this particular client, but there needs to be a specific red flag in respect of the payments in front of the bank at the time."
