London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE

Signature Litigation recognised in the Lexology Index: Investigations 2026 report

29 April 2026

Together with Global Investigations Review, the Lexology Index establishes the leading investigations lawyers, digital forensic experts and forensic accountants globally.

The Lexology Index provides comprehensive data-led research into the leading lawyers and experts, used by law firms and companies globally. It is the number one platform for global legal intelligence, with over 950,000 registered users from over 100 countries.

Mark Beardsworth is 'Highly Recommended' and Duncan Grieve is 'Recommended'. The Guide notes that ‘Highly Recommended’ rankings are awarded to individuals who have performed very well in Lexology’s research, representing around 30–35% of listed practitioners, while ‘Recommended’ rankings are given to individuals considered leaders in their field, with fewer than 50% of those considered selected for inclusion.