Administrative and Public LawBanking and Financial Markets LitigationCivil Fraud, Asset Tracing and RecoveryCommercial LitigationCompetition LawConstruction and Engineering DisputesContentious Trusts, Estates and Private Wealth DisputesGroup Action LitigationInsolvency LitigationInsurance and Reinsurance LitigationInternational ArbitrationInvestigations and White Collar CrimeProduct LiabilityProfessional Negligence LitigationToxic Tort and ESG
Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.
FIND OUT MORE
Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.
FIND OUT MORE
Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.
FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.
FIND OUT MOREPartner Nicolas Brooke and Marie-Agnès Nicolas, Counsel at Hughes Hubbard & Reed, discuss the French Supreme Court's milestone decision on 25 November 2020, holding that a target company’s criminal liability could be transferred to the acquiring entity as a result of a “merger by acquisition”. They further examine how the Court acknowledged the existence of an “economic and operational continuity” between merged companies and suggests how the latter should get themselves in working order, in Revue Internationale de la Compliance et de l’Ethique des Affaires. Nicolas and Marie-Agnès' article was published in Revue Internationale de la Compliance et de l’Ethique des Affaires, February 2021, and can be found here.
On November 25, 2020, the French Supreme Court issued a milestone decision holding that a target company’s criminal liability could be transferred to the acquiring entity as a result of a “merger by acquisition”. In doing so, the Cour de cassation reversed a well-established body of precedents according to which Article L. 121-1 of the French Criminal Code - which establishes that one cannot be held liable for a third party’s misconduct - prevented an acquiring company from being prosecuted for offenses committed prior to the merger by the acquired company, which was dissolved as a result of the merger. Indeed, the Court acknowledged the existence of an “economic and operational continuity” between merged companies. While various signals made such an evolution foreseeable, its practical consequences remain to be assessed. This comment suggests how companies should get themselves in working order.
