Administrative and Public LawBanking and Financial Markets LitigationCivil Fraud, Asset Tracing and RecoveryCommercial LitigationCompetition LawConstruction and Engineering DisputesContentious Trusts, Estates and Private Wealth DisputesGroup Action LitigationInsolvency LitigationInsurance and Reinsurance LitigationInternational ArbitrationInvestigations and White Collar CrimeProduct LiabilityProfessional Negligence LitigationToxic Tort and ESG
Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.
FIND OUT MORE
Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.
FIND OUT MORE
Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.
FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.
FIND OUT MOREPartner Daniel Spendlove comments in Private Debt Investor in relation to litigation funding as part of the publication's special report on distressed debt and special situations investments. Daniel's comments on litigation funding were published in Private Debt Investor, 3 June 2019. The full article can be read on the Private Debt Investor website here. "The high returns reflect the inherent risk and unpredictability of outcome in litigation,"
"Investment decisions are typically made very early in the life cycle of a case, when, in most cases, the full evidential picture is unavailable. Funders price this risk into the returns sought.""
"Investors will inevitably be attracted by the high rates of return that can potentially be achieved through investing in litigation, particularly at a time when investment performance elsewhere may be underwhelming. Funders typically look for returns of at least 2.5/3 times the amount invested (plus principal), or a percentage of damages, 25 / 30% seems commonplace, whichever is greater."
"Funders must ensure that they do not control the litigation, as this would offend the common law rules of champerty and maintenance. The law does, however, recognise that providing finance is not in and of itself "control." Potential funders should also be aware of the risks of being liable for the opponent's costs if the litigation fails. To address this risk, funders typically require specialist insurance cover, known as After The Event insurance, to be in place alongside the funding package in order to meet any potential adverse costs orders."
