London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE

Partner Abdulali Jiwaji discusses FX manipulation fines on BBC World News

20 May 2015

 ...

UBS, the Swiss bank, has already revealed in a statement just what it is looking at in terms of fines. Talk us through that.

Abdulali Jiwaji: UBS has agreed terms… of broadly around USD 500million, and there is also a guilty plea which has been entered in respect to prior breaches in relation to the Libor scandal. I think we will today also see other settlements being announced by the other banks.

UBS though got off to a degree, didn’t it, because it said in a statement that it had cooperated with the authorities in the United States?

AJ: That I think bought it some credit; it went first, and in today's market, for all banks, that's a real factor. Where there's been a course of conduct which is wrong, the first person to go to the authorities will get some credit.

We’ve heard that it’s the parent companies of some of these banks that will now plead guilty to this manipulation. How significant is that, because there were concerns that they wanted it to be their smaller divisions, their foreign units, and that effect would prevent them from being banned in certain markets. How important is it that we are getting the parent companies doing that?

AJ: Its psychologically important for the market to see the parent company on the hook for these offences. What is also true is that it is becoming more difficult for the parent companies to get the waivers that are required from regulators to be able to carry on with their business as normal.

Will today draw a line under this? The legal proceedings are very complicated in all of this – there may be civil prosecutions as well?

AJ: Yes, that’s right. In Europe especially, we still have criminal and competition related investigations ongoing. Importantly, we are still awaiting the outcomes of investigations into individuals – there will be regulatory and criminal actions against the individuals – and those actions will feed any future civil claims.

When we talk about the entirety of this mess, we are talking about a bill of about USD 10billion. Who will ultimately end up paying? A lot of people are saying, frankly, this is not enough to change their behaviour. Yet, when you add it all up, GBP 10billion is a lot of money.

AJ: It is a lot of money, and the proceeds of that, will, to some extent go to the government, and there is a benefit there. The remarkable thing is that there is no regulatory redress in place – hence the need for private institutions to look at civil litigation.

Abdul on BBC

 

 

 

 

 

Read the BBC’s business live reporting stream for the 20th May 2015 here.