London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE

Kate Gee comments on the FCA’s proposal to lift the ban on crypto exchange-traded notes for retail investors in Law360

23 June 2025

Partner Kate Gee commented:

“This proposal represents a rebalancing of the FCA’s approach to the risks involved in investing in crypto, taking into account the growth of the UK’s crypto industry (and its place globally) and investor appetite for direct access to higher risk investments. The announcement is consistent with the draft crypto rules announced in April this year.

“The FCA relies on the existing financial promotion rules to protect potential retail investors investing in cETNs. These include that investors have access to information on the risks, there is no over-promotion or inappropriate incentive to invest, in the same way as if they bought cryptoassets directly.

“The proposal will be welcomed by the crypto sector and with proper implementation, the financial promotion rules may be sufficient protection for retail investors in these circumstances. However, firms – closely supervised by the FCA – would need to ensure that careful consideration is given to how cETNs are marketed and to how the specific risks are properly explained to all potential retail customers, including those who do not bring with them prior experience of investing in cryptoassets or with no pre-existing knowledge of the crypto market. As this will be a new, less sophisticated target investor, particular care and attention will need to be taken to ensure that the promotion of cETNs are sufficiently ‘fair, clear and not misleading’ – risks will need to be set out clearly, potentially by way of an upfront risk summary, using language that is easy to understand, which does not ‘trivialise the risks involved or take advantage of consumers’ lack of experience or knowledge.’ The FCA ought to closely monitor the promotion and uptake of these products, and carefully scrutinise whether the existing financial promotion rules offer sufficient protection to retail investors or whether clearer guidance to firms, enhanced risk warnings or other further protections are required.”