Administrative and Public LawBanking and Financial Markets LitigationCivil Fraud, Asset Tracing and RecoveryCommercial LitigationCompetition LawConstruction and Engineering DisputesContentious Trusts, Estates and Private Wealth DisputesGroup Action LitigationInsolvency LitigationInsurance and Reinsurance LitigationInternational ArbitrationInvestigations and White Collar CrimeProduct LiabilityProfessional Negligence LitigationToxic Tort and ESG
Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.
FIND OUT MORE
Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.
FIND OUT MORE
Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.
FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.
FIND OUT MOREPartner Josh Wong and Senior Associate George Bazinas examine in LexisNexis Restructuring & Insolvency Report the recent decision in CIHL v Protopapas & Others in which they acted for Cape Intermediate Holdings Ltd and Cape Plc.
Josh and George's article was published in LexisNexis Restructuring & Insolvency Report, 10 November 2025, here.
Article summary: "Restructuring & Insolvency analysis: The High Court reaffirmed the primacy of English jurisdiction over the governance of English companies while recognising limits on its extraterritorial reach. Mr Justice Mann declined to restrain De Beers from settling US proceedings initiated by a South Carolina ‘long-arm’ receiver, holding that English courts will not compel defendants to contest foreign litigation they wish to resolve commercially. The decision preserves the English court’s declarations that the receiver lacked authority while clarifying that third parties may settle such proceedings without risking contempt. The judgment underscores a pragmatic balance between protecting English corporate sovereignty and respecting international comity in cross-border disputes."
