London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE

Gaëtan de Robillard discusses Trade Secrets under French law

23 March 2020

Trade Secrets Protection Under French Law

Trade secrets play an important role in business litigation and is a major preoccupation for companies sued before French Courts.

In order to deal with these issues, which have become recurrent in Court, French Law has developed a legislative arsenal that is now well known to litigants, consisting of the Law of 30 July 2018 and its implementing Decree of 11 December 2018.

What Is The Scope Of This Trade Secrets Measure?

To be covered by the trade secrets measure, a piece of information must meet three cumulative conditions listed in Article L. 151-1 of the French Commercial Code:

1. firstly, it must not be general knowledge or easily accessible;

2. then, it must have a commercial value;

3. and lastly, it must be protected by its legitimate holder.

In concrete terms, this means that customer files, a skill, sale statistics, a marketing or commercial study could be covered by the measure.

However, a company's business plan, which has no commercial value, will not be able to benefit from trade secrets protection.

What Are The Measures Available To Guarantee Trade Secrets?

  • If a piece of information is covered by trade secrets, several measures are provided for in order to avoid it being disclosed:
  • For example, the possibility of having non-adversarial hearings in order to rule on the communication or production of exhibits covered by trade secrets;
  • The Judge can also read the exhibit alone or only enter into discussions with the representatives of the parties and not the parties themselves,
  • He/she can also order the communication or production of an exhibit in a non-confidential form or as a summary;
  • In the scope of preparatory investigative measures, the Judge will be able to automatically order the placing in escrow of the seized exhibits, which will enable their immediate communication to the seizing party to be avoided.

If this measure continues to raise questions (notably regarding the release from escrow of the seized exhibits on the basis of Article 145 of the French Code of Civil Procedure), it generally appears to be an answer to companies' needs.

Is This Mechanism Affected By The Civil Procedure Law Reform?

Fortunately, this trade secrets measure has not been affected by the reform of civil procedure law, which implements a principle of automatic provisional enforcement of Court decisions handed down after 1 January 2020.

In accordance with Articles R. 153-8 and R. 153-9 of the French Commercial Code, decisions handed down regarding trade secrets, in the scope of both preparatory measures and proceedings on the merits, cannot be granted provisional enforcement when they accede to the request for exhibits to be communicated or produced. Trade secrets are, therefore, not concerned by the principle of provisional enforcement of Court decisions.

Such a solution is welcome considering the sensitiveness of the information covered by trade secrets and its importance for companies, notably regarding competitiveness.