London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE

Daniel Spendlove’s comments re Barclays and FX published in Legal Business

4 March 2015

By Sarah Downey

The fallout from the Forex rigging scandal continues to rumble on with Barclays this week being the latest in a long line of banks to set aside huge sums to deal with the matter. The bank this week announced that it had set aside an additional provision of GBP 750m in the last quarter of 2014 for ongoing investigations and litigation relating to Forex rigging investigations and related litigation.

The provision swells to GBP 1.25bn the funds set aside for Forex liabilities. An additional GBP 200m was allocated to re-dress customers mis-sold payment protection insurance. The Forex provision was enough to lead to a sharp fall in the booked profit of Barclays’ investment banking arm.

Barclays as a group did enjoy a 12% rise in adjusted pre-tax profit to GBP 5.5bn for the 2014 year, excluding the forex provision, while for the last quarter of 2014 litigation and conduct costs totalled GBP 140m.

In November Barclays opted out of a major settlement reached by five banks with UK and US regulators for allegedly failing to stop traders from trying to manipulate the foreign exchange market, with HSBC, Royal Bank of Scotland, UBS, JP Morgan Chase and Citibank collectively levied a GBP 2bn fine.

In the US Barclays is currently embroiled in a class action against it and a host of other banks over claims related to Forex, for which it has turned to Sullivan & Cromwell. Clifford Chance is advising Barclays in the UK.

Barclays’ announcement comes after three years that have seen unprecedented levels of regulatory activity against major banking groups for Forex and a range of other conduct issues. Other banks to this year unveil USD 1bn-plus legal expenses for Forex include JP Morgan Chase and Citigroup.

Signature Litigation lawyer Daniel Spendlove commented: ‘Although the massive fines imposed on banks for regulatory failings are well documented, it remains to be seen what the impact of the FX scandal will be in terms of civil claims. Investors who believe they have suffered losses by reason of the banks' conduct will doubtless be keeping a close eye on the outcome of the ongoing investigations to see if further material emerges to support a claim.’

See the original article here.