London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE

Counsel Kate Gee comments on the Law Commission’s recommendations for reforms to digital assets in The Fintech Times

3 July 2023

Kate's comments follow the UK Law Commission publishing its final report on its recommendations for the reform of digital asset laws, which describes the UK as "well-placed" as a jurisdiction for these new financial services.

Counsel Kate Gee commented: "The report is a clear endorsement of the work done to date in the digital asset space by legal professionals and the courts of England and Wales to adapt and innovate as has been required. The report “champions” the common law system, and draws directly from its successes to form the foundation on which further common law development and statutory reform (albeit limited) can be based. There is unwavering support for the ongoing dynamism of the private law of England and Wales, with a view to this jurisdiction remaining a “globally competitive and flexible tool for market participants in the digital asset space”.

Overall, the proposals for reform are intentionally limited. Because the laws and courts of England and Wales have proven to be sufficiently resilient and flexible to recognise certain digital assets as things to which personal property rights can relate, those issues have already been dealt with sufficiently. the remaining areas of legal uncertainty are therefore “highly nuanced and complex” – and this will continue to be the case as both technology and the market for these types of assets continue to develop.

From a disputes perspective, the Commission’s conclusions are significant and are likely to lead to claimants bringing new or reformulated causes of action in claims relating to digital assets."