Administrative and Public LawBanking and Financial Markets LitigationCivil Fraud, Asset Tracing and RecoveryCommercial LitigationCompetition LawConstruction and Engineering DisputesContentious Trusts, Estates and Private Wealth DisputesGroup Action LitigationInsolvency LitigationInsurance and Reinsurance LitigationInternational ArbitrationInvestigations and White Collar CrimeProduct LiabilityProfessional Negligence LitigationToxic Tort and ESG
Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.
FIND OUT MORE
Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.
FIND OUT MORE
Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.
FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.
FIND OUT MOREPartner Becca Hogan comments in an article published in In House Lawyer exploring the rise of group litigation claims and what General Counsels should be mindful of. Becca’s comments were published in In House Lawyer, 11 December 2023, here.
On group claims:
"The question often asked is whether the rise of group claims is driving the growth in funding, or the reverse? I think it’s probably a bit of both. Without funding, there would be no group claims because you wouldn’t have the quantum base to withstand the costs involved. The courts also have a role to play – they’ve shown an increased willingness to hear these types of claims in recent years."
On PACCAR:
“I don't think that’s the end of litigation funding, it’s caused a lot more work in the meantime, but it’s not going anywhere. It would be good to get clarity in legislation.”
