London image

London

Founded in 2012, Signature Litigation has grown into one of London’s pre-eminent specialist dispute resolution practices. From the outset, we set out to do things differently: a conflict-free, disputes-only platform designed to give clients the undivided focus and strategic agility that complex, high-stakes matters demand.

FIND OUT MORE
Gibraltar image

Gibraltar

Established in 2017, Signature Litigation's Gibraltar office was founded to address growing demand for specialist expertise in commercial litigation and private wealth disputes on the Rock.

FIND OUT MORE
Paris image

Paris

Signature Litigation AARPI houses one of France’s most enviable product liability practices, with the team also handling commercial and corporate litigation, insurance and reinsurance, toxic tort and ESG, civil fraud and asset tracing, international arbitration, administrative and public law.

FIND OUT MORE
Frankfurt image

Frankfurt

Frankfurt has emerged as one of Europe's foremost financial and commercial centres and, increasingly, as a bridge between European and Asian markets. With that growth comes an increasing demand for sophisticated dispute resolution. Signature Litigation established its Frankfurt office to meet this need, bringing our conflict-free, disputes-only platform to the German market.

FIND OUT MORE
Pietro Grassi's profile photo

Pietro Grassi

Counsel

The quality of their service has always been exceptional. The team excels at developing and coordinating litigation strategies that are not only thorough but also realistic and perfectly aligned with clients’ expectations. 

– The Legal 500 EMEA 2026

The team is excellent, always ready to meet our needs and anticipate risks and expectations.

– The Legal 500 EMEA 2026
Very good advice, to the point and with attention to detail. 
– The Legal 500 EMEA 2026

Pietro is a Counsel at Signature’s London office specialising in public international law, investor-State arbitration, and international commercial arbitration.

He has advised and represented corporations, individuals, and States on matters of public international law before national and international courts and tribunals, as well as arbitral tribunals constituted under major arbitration rules (eg ICC, ICSID, LCIA, SCC, and UNCITRAL). He is often engaged in pro bono litigation involving human rights issues. He also has significant experience in regulatory and white-collar crime investigations, especially in Brazil and in Lusophone Africa.

Highlights of his career include securing USD455 million for an US-based bottle maker in an ICSID claim against a Latin American State, successfully obtaining provisional measures for a politically persecuted South American individual in proceedings before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights, and acting for a DOJ-appointed independent monitor of a Brazil-headquartered international conglomerate.

Pietro is recognised as a ‘Leading Associate’ for international arbitration in The Legal 500 UK 2026 Guide. He has been described as “standout” and “extremely talented.” Previous Guides have also called him “excellent”, highlighting his “fantastic drafting skills” and “eye to the bigger strategic picture.” Pietro has also been ranked in previous editions of The Legal 500 UK Guide for his commercial litigation expertise. He has been described as “very approachable” and someone who “stands out for his extreme knowledge of details of a case, his level of coordinating all process matters and very friendly attitude.”

Before joining Signature, Pietro was an Associate at Morrison & Foerster LLP. Prior to entering private practice, he worked at the European Union Delegation to the Organisation for Security and Co-operation in Europe (OSCE) and at the Special Tribunal for Lebanon (STL).

Pietro is admitted to practice in Brazil and Portugal, and is a Registered Foreign Lawyer with the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) in England and Wales. He is fluent in Italian and Portuguese, and speaks Spanish.

Investment Treaty Arbitration

  • Representing a global conglomerate engaged in the procurement and export of agricultural commodities with operations across Africa, in relation to a USD 400m investment treaty arbitration against an East African State and involving allegations of expropriation of the investor’s goods and other malfeasances.
  • Representing US investor Discovery Global LLC in a USD 600m ICSID arbitration against Slovakia concerning breaches of the US-Slovakia Bilateral Investment Treaty relating to Discovery’s investment in oil and gas exploration activities in eastern Slovakia
  • Representing one of the world’s largest mining companies in a USD 500m investment treaty UNCITRAL claim against Liberia relating to a lucrative iron ore mining project and involving issues of expropriations and allegations of conspiracy between the state and another mining conglomerate.
  • Representing a one of the largest privately owned US industrial conglomerates in a USD 400mn ICSID dispute against a South American country in relation to the development, construction and operation of two fertiliser factories and concerning expropriation, violation of FET and full protection and security standards.
  • Representing an European investor in ICSID arbitration proceedings against a South American state in connection with the direct expropriation of the investment in the glass manufacturing industry as well as violations of FET, full protection and security, and transfer of funds. One of the classic “direct expropriation” cases against Venezuela with Hugo Chavez announcing the expropriation on national television. Fourth largest ICSID award on record at the time the award was issued.
  • Representing an European subsidiary of one of the largest European PE funds in SCC USD 500m claim against an Eastern European country in connection with the indirect expropriation of their investment in the financial sector arising out of a regulatory change prohibiting the investor from exercising its voting rights and consequently being forced to sell his investment.
  • Representing a Malaysian investor in connection with two large-scale mining projects in Poland in a USD 500m ICC investment treaty arbitration involving allegations of expropriation, breaches of the FET and FPS standards, and a breach of the obligation to encourage and create favourable conditions for foreign investors pursuant to the Malaysia-Poland Bilateral Investment Treaty.
  • Representing a European services company in set aside and enforcement proceedings concerning an ad hoc UNCITRAL arbitration award against a South American country with respect to claims in excess of USD 250m relating to economic measures targeting the investor’s customs infrastructure investment.
  • Representing a group of investors in a large-scale mining project in Eastern Europe in a USD 220m UNCITRAL investment treaty arbitration claim against the host State involving allegations of expropriation and breaches of the FET standard
  • Representing the investor in PCA/UNCITRAL arbitration arising out of the expropriation of the claimant’s liquid petroleum gas infrastructure in Pakistan (jurisdiction only).
  • Representing investors in an ICSID arbitration involving denial of justice claims against an East Asian country over its failure to pursue a fraud prosecution against its local partner arising out of a USD 50m investment in a copper, gold, and iron mining project.
  • Advising foreign investors in countries such as Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Luxembourg, Mozambique, Norway, Portugal, Saudi Arabia, Turkey and the UAE in relation to legal remedies under investment protection instruments.

International Commercial Arbitration

  • Representing an entity within a large gambling group in a USD 600m ICC dispute arising out of a joint-venture partnership with a listed software group in relation to a project in LATAM.
  • Representing the claimants in a USD 25m claim against a leading Thai wind energy company concerning the respondent’s refusal and/or failure to indemnify and keep indemnified the claimants in accordance with the terms of an indemnity agreement.
  • Representing the claimant in an ICC commercial arbitration concerning engineering and prototype agreements manufactured in Europe and commercialised in China.
  • Representing the respondent in an LCIA commercial arbitration in connection with a sales agreement for liquefied petroleum gas.
  • Representing the defendants in a Section 68, English Arbitration Act challenge to set aside a LCIA award.

Civil Fraud, Asset Tracing & Recovery

  • Representing the investment fund of Georgian billionaire Bidzina Ivanishvili and his family in a dispute valued at USD 600m–USD 1.2bn against Credit Suisse entities for the recovery of losses arising out of mismanagement of his investment portfolio through a range of trust arrangements, which have led to criminal proceedings against the bank’s fund managers. This case involved parallel proceedings in Switzerland, Singapore, New Zealand and Bermuda.
  • Representing the former executive management team of Wind Energy Holdings Limited, Thailand’s largest wind energy company, in defending a high-profile claim of over USD 800m. The claim gave rise to issues of fiduciary duty and highlights the complexities of cross-jurisdictional legal issues arising out of allegations of civil fraud. This case is featured in The Lawyer’s Top 20 Cases of 2022.
  • Representing joint administrators of a company involved in a massive cryptocurrency pyramid scheme that defrauded around 700,000 creditors. We are conducting and coordinating global asset tracing and recovery in the context of ongoing cross-border insolvency proceedings with the value of claims between GBP 500m and GBP 5bn.

Public International Law and International Human Rights

  • Representing a politically persecuted South American individual in proceedings before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights.
  • Advising an American state on its sovereign immunity rights in litigation before the courts of an European state in the context of a NATO military base; advising that same state on the possibility of bringing a claim before the International Court of Justice.
  • Advising the same American state on its sovereign immunity rights in litigation before the courts of another European state in the context of an employment claim.
  • Advising an African state on electoral best practices in light of its public international law obligations.
  • Advising a Middle Eastern state on its international humanitarian law rights and obligations in the region.
  • Advising a South American state on its obligations deriving from a judgment of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights.
  • Representing an individual who seek leave to remain in the United Kingdom as a stateless person.
  • Petitioning an African court against an abortion ban in light of the State’s obligations under the African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights and other human rights treaties.
  • Advising a non-profit organisation on strategic litigation before the courts of African state and before the East Africa Court of Justice on law reforms affecting the ability of the civil society in that state to self-organise as a non-profit entity.
  • Working with the Alliance for Marriage in the Americas to ensure marriage equality through the Inter-American Human Rights System.

Investigations and White Collar Crime

  • Representing DOJ-appointed independent monitor of a Brazil-headquartered international conglomerate operating in engineering, infrastructure and petrochemicals sectors.
  • Managing a FCPA investigation for an international management consulting firm prompted by the “Luanda Leaks”.
  • Managing a FCPA investigation for an international management consulting firm in connection with the investigations initiated by and the assassination of the Maltese journalist Daphne Caruana Galizia.

Article: Organised crime risk and capital markets: what the Banco Master fallout means for foreign investors – Thomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence – 12 March 2026

Article: Odebrecht in Peru: why the latest criminal charges matter for every arbitration user – Financial Regulation International – November 2025

Article: Collateral consequences: corruption’s ripple effect on arbitrationLitigation Finance Insider – 7 December 2025

Article: Lingering shadows: when corruption scandals generate a second wave of arbitration claimsThomson Reuters Regulatory Intelligence – 27 November 2025

Article: Criminal charges in Peru matter for everyone – The Law Society Gazette – 26 September 2025

Interview: Signature Litigation Harnesses Jus AI for Smarter, Faster Arbitration – Jus Mundi – 17 June 2025

Article: Modernising England’s arbitration lawsThe Law Society Gazette – 21 March 2025

Article: State immunity and arbitration – New Law Journal – 23 January 2025

Article: UK withdrawal from the Energy Charter Treaty has important implications for investors – The Energy Industry Times – 23 March 2024

Article: English Arbitration Act: Law Commission’s progressive amendmentsSolicitors Journal – 6 October 2023

Article: Guest Comment, Macro developments in the mining sector going forward – Global Mining Review – April 2022, Volume 5, Issue 3

Article: “UK Introduces New Global Anti-Corruption Sanctions Regime”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 20 May 2021

Article: ”Arbitrator bias: lessons from sports arbitration”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 18 April 2021

Article: “EU Set to Introduce Mandatory Environmental and Human Rights Due Diligence Law”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 23 March 2021

Article: “From genesis to apocalypse: As Belgium heralds the end of the uncertainty on intra-EU BITs, has the UK missed an opportunity in a post-Brexit world?”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 26 February 2021

Article: “Modern slavery in financial services: no room for complacency”, Practical Law Magazine, 25 February 2021

Article: “The World Is Your Oyster? Supreme Court Confirms UK Jurisdictional Gateway for Parent Company Liability”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 18 February 2021

Article: “Watch Out and Speak Up: The UK Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner calls for Immediate Action in the Finance Industry”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 1 February 2021

Article: “The New ICC Arbitration Rules”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 12 January 2021

Article: “Thank you, next, please: English court strikes out business and human rights claim in light of parallel proceedings in Brazil”, Practical Law Dispute Resolution Blog, 3 December 2020

Article: “A Shift Towards a More Co-ordinated Approach? – The LCIA Updates Its Arbitration Rules”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 19 August 2020

Article: “UK Companies Responsible for Business and Human Rights Violations Overseas”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 8 June 2020

Article: “Agreement for the termination of intra-EU BITs signed: the bell tolls?”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 14 May 2020

Article: “Micula v Romania: rematch clause activated?”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 6 March 2020

Article: “Macau Ups Its Game: A Discussion on the New Arbitration Law 2019”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 21 January 2020

Article: “MoFo APAC Arbitration Update: October 2019”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, October 2019

Article: “Micula v Romania: an OK (and not a KO) in the latest round of proceedings”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 27 September 2019

Article: “UK Introduces New Global Anti-Corruption Sanctions Regime”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 20 May 2021

Article: ”Arbitrator bias: lessons from sports arbitration”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 18 April 2021

Article: “EU Set to Introduce Mandatory Environmental and Human Rights Due Diligence Law”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 23 March 2021

Article: “From genesis to apocalypse: As Belgium heralds the end of the uncertainty on intra-EU BITs, has the UK missed an opportunity in a post-Brexit world?”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 26 February 2021

Article: “Modern slavery in financial services: no room for complacency”, Practical Law Magazine, 25 February 2021

Article: “The World Is Your Oyster? Supreme Court Confirms UK Jurisdictional Gateway for Parent Company Liability”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 18 February 2021

Article: “Watch Out and Speak Up: The UK Independent Anti-Slavery Commissioner calls for Immediate Action in the Finance Industry”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 1 February 2021

Article: “The New ICC Arbitration Rules”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 12 January 2021

Article: “Thank you, next, please: English court strikes out business and human rights claim in light of parallel proceedings in Brazil”, Practical Law Dispute Resolution Blog, 3 December 2020

Article: “A Shift Towards a More Co-ordinated Approach? – The LCIA Updates Its Arbitration Rules”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 19 August 2020

Article: “UK Companies Responsible for Business and Human Rights Violations Overseas”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, 8 June 2020

Article: “Agreement for the termination of intra-EU BITs signed: the bell tolls?”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 14 May 2020

Article: “Micula v Romania: rematch clause activated?”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 6 March 2020

Article: “Macau Ups Its Game: A Discussion on the New Arbitration Law 2019”, Kluwer Arbitration Blog, 21 January 2020

Article: “MoFo APAC Arbitration Update: October 2019”, Morrison & Foerster LLP, October 2019

Article: “Micula v Romania: an OK (and not a KO) in the latest round of proceedings”, Practical Law Arbitration Blog, 27 September 2019